Huffington Postさんのインスタグラム写真 - (Huffington PostInstagram)「Scientific American has dipped a toe into political waters for the first time in its 175-year history and is endorsing Joe Biden for president.⁠ ⁠ The science and research publication is publishing the endorsement in a two-page statement in its upcoming October issue.⁠ ⁠ “Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history,” the editors wrote. “This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.”⁠ ⁠ As would be expected of a science-focused publication, the editors rested their argument on facts and evidence, concluding that Trump’s rejection of facts and evidence “has badly damaged the U.S. and its people.”⁠ ⁠ In everything from Trump’s “dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic” to his attacks on “environmental protections, medical care, and the researchers and public science agencies that help this country prepare for its greatest challenges,” Trump’s refusal to make fact-based, data-driven decisions has pushed the U.S. far off course, they argued.⁠ ⁠ “His administration has been even worse for science than we feared,” Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth told HuffPost in an email. “We couldn’t include all of our objections to his record in two print pages.”⁠ ⁠ Helmuth stressed that the endorsement isn’t partisan; neither major political party was even mentioned in the explanation. Biden, however, is “the clear choice when you compare the candidates on science, health, the environment and other research-related concerns.”⁠ ⁠ Read more at our link in bio. // 📝 @g_nobes // 📷 Getty Images」9月17日 2時45分 - huffpost

Huffington Postのインスタグラム(huffpost) - 9月17日 02時45分


Scientific American has dipped a toe into political waters for the first time in its 175-year history and is endorsing Joe Biden for president.⁠

The science and research publication is publishing the endorsement in a two-page statement in its upcoming October issue.⁠

“Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history,” the editors wrote. “This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.”⁠

As would be expected of a science-focused publication, the editors rested their argument on facts and evidence, concluding that Trump’s rejection of facts and evidence “has badly damaged the U.S. and its people.”⁠

In everything from Trump’s “dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic” to his attacks on “environmental protections, medical care, and the researchers and public science agencies that help this country prepare for its greatest challenges,” Trump’s refusal to make fact-based, data-driven decisions has pushed the U.S. far off course, they argued.⁠

“His administration has been even worse for science than we feared,” Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth told HuffPost in an email. “We couldn’t include all of our objections to his record in two print pages.”⁠

Helmuth stressed that the endorsement isn’t partisan; neither major political party was even mentioned in the explanation. Biden, however, is “the clear choice when you compare the candidates on science, health, the environment and other research-related concerns.”⁠

Read more at our link in bio. // 📝 @g_nobes // 📷 Getty Images


[BIHAKUEN]UVシールド(UVShield)

>> 飲む日焼け止め!「UVシールド」を購入する

18,677

492

2020/9/17

The Macallanのインスタグラム
The Macallanさんがフォロー

Huffington Postを見た方におすすめの有名人