Huffington Postさんのインスタグラム写真 - (Huffington PostInstagram)「The Supreme Court’s ideological divisions were on full display Thursday as it handed down its ruling on affirmative action: All six conservative justices declared such programs unconstitutional, while all three liberals voted to preserve them.⁠ ⁠ Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson penned separate, fiery rebuttals to the majority, joined in each by Justice Elena Kagan.⁠ ⁠ The high court had combined two cases addressing the same topic — one against Harvard, and another against the University of North Carolina. While Sotomayor’s dissent covered both cases, Jackson recused herself from the Harvard case because she received both her undergraduate and law degrees from the institution and had recently sat on its board. She focused instead on the UNC case and the overall purpose of affirmative action programs.⁠ ⁠ Sotomayor and Jackson each slammed the majority for ignoring that historical discrimination and the present-day inequalities it produced.⁠ ⁠ The decision, Sotomayor wrote, was “not grounded in law or fact.”⁠ ⁠ It “stunts … progress without any basis in law, history, logic or justice,” Jackson said.⁠ ⁠ Read more blistering lines from their dissents at our link in bio. // 📷️: Getty Images // 🖊️: Sara Boboltz」6月30日 2時59分 - huffpost

Huffington Postのインスタグラム(huffpost) - 6月30日 02時59分


The Supreme Court’s ideological divisions were on full display Thursday as it handed down its ruling on affirmative action: All six conservative justices declared such programs unconstitutional, while all three liberals voted to preserve them.⁠

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson penned separate, fiery rebuttals to the majority, joined in each by Justice Elena Kagan.⁠

The high court had combined two cases addressing the same topic — one against Harvard, and another against the University of North Carolina. While Sotomayor’s dissent covered both cases, Jackson recused herself from the Harvard case because she received both her undergraduate and law degrees from the institution and had recently sat on its board. She focused instead on the UNC case and the overall purpose of affirmative action programs.⁠

Sotomayor and Jackson each slammed the majority for ignoring that historical discrimination and the present-day inequalities it produced.⁠

The decision, Sotomayor wrote, was “not grounded in law or fact.”⁠

It “stunts … progress without any basis in law, history, logic or justice,” Jackson said.⁠

Read more blistering lines from their dissents at our link in bio. // 📷️: Getty Images // 🖊️: Sara Boboltz


[BIHAKUEN]UVシールド(UVShield)

>> 飲む日焼け止め!「UVシールド」を購入する

25,221

519

2023/6/30

repostappのインスタグラム
repostappさんがフォロー

Huffington Postを見た方におすすめの有名人